Former Indian cricketer Navjot Singh Sidhu has criticized all-rounder Ravindra Jadeja for his incapacity to win Test matches for India in overseas conditions, regardless of Jadeja’s current unbeaten century of 107 runs in Manchester that helped India safe a draw in the fourth Test in opposition to England at Old Trafford.Jadeja’s innings proved essential in Manchester as he tackled the uneven bounce on the ultimate day, with Washington Sundar offering help from the opposite finish. The partnership helped hold the collection alive for India.
“I have praised Jadeja a lot. Kapil Dev was a bowling all-rounder, and he won a lot of Tests for India in overseas. But Jadeja has done well in the supporting role away from home. He bowls his overs quickly and executes restrictive bowling, but he is unable to win Test matches, and it has been evident since the first Test,” Sidhu mentioned on his YouTube channel.The criticism of Jadeja intensified after India’s current 22-run defeat at Lord’s. Both groups had scored 387 runs after day three, however the Lord’s pitch turned difficult in the final 4 days.India managed to bowl out England for 192, setting themselves a goal of 193 runs. However, England’s quick bowlers, led by Ben Stokes and Jofra Archer, lowered India to 58/4 and later 112/8.Jadeja, who remained unbeaten on 61, was the final acknowledged batsman with India nonetheless needing 81 runs for victory. He tried to struggle alongside tail-enders Jasprit Bumrah and Mohammed Siraj.The match ended when spinner Shoaib Bashir dismissed Siraj, with the ball’s overspin inflicting it to hit the stumps. India in the end fell quick by 22 runs.
Poll
Should Navjot Singh Sidhu’s criticism of Jadeja be taken severely?
During the resistance, Jadeja’s method was notably conservative, as he averted rotating the strike or trying boundary pictures.Former India captain Mohammad Azharuddin urged {that a} extra optimistic method from Jadeja may have resulted in India main the collection 2-1 as an alternative of going through a deficit.Jadeja’s efficiency has been a subject of dialogue amongst cricket consultants, with many questioning his ability to ship match-successful performances in difficult overseas conditions.