ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude: Ever since these synthetic intelligence (AI) chatbots have been launched, they’ve been usually in contrast in opposition to one another. Looking at them on the floor stage, you may assume that there’s not quite a bit separating these AI bots from each other. However, a better inspection would inform you that every of them thrives in some particular duties, whereas struggling in others. So, if you would like one in every of these assistants to put in writing an e mail for you, which one are you able to belief probably the most? How about picture era?
In this text, we evaluate ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude throughout key on a regular basis use circumstances that will help you determine which one suits your on a regular basis wants finest.
Email writing is an artwork. Used principally in workplace settings, the right e mail is skilled but heat. It informs, and on the similar time, makes the knowledge straightforward to learn and course of. It is neither repetitive nor imprecise, and neither ought to the tone come throughout as curt or impolite. With so many restrictions, it’s important to strike the correct stability.
So, we examined ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude with an e mail immediate that requires balancing data with sensitivity. If you would like to check the chatbots, you can even use these prompts to evaluate the outcomes.
Prompt: Write an e mail to my boss explaining that I would like a go away for 10 days (between September 1-10) as a result of I’m getting married. Keep it skilled however heat.
ChatGPT: The chatbot’s response was skilled and impartial, and didn’t deal with making the tone heat. While it adopted the directions, it didn’t embody data equivalent to making ready a handover for the go away or explaining availability.
Gemini: Google’s chatbot managed to convey every little thing: the correct tone, all the mandatory data, and readable paragraphs. The e mail was brief however ample, and most often, acceptable.
Email written by Claude
Claude: I may need made Gemini the winner if I had not learn Claude’s response. The chatbot considered data that I didn’t even take into account, equivalent to briefing teammates on ongoing tasks and organising an out-of-office message. Even when it loses some factors for its overly formal tone, its structured output offers it a transparent edge.
Winner: Claude. (Gemini’s response may work higher with an off-the-cuff supervisor.)
With solely restricted time in a day, you can not spend an hour going by means of a 40-page report or an evaluation. Sometimes, you want an AI assistant that may learn the content material and clarify what is going on on in a short paragraph or with a number of bullet factors. So, that is precisely what we examined these chatbots on.
Prompt: Summarise this text. (We shared a Word doc of one in every of our function tales. This one, when you have been curious.)
ChatGPT: The OpenAI chatbot summarised the 1,000-word article in about three to 4 paragraphs. It divided the paragraphs into completely different themes, making it simpler to course of whereas nonetheless with the ability to join one paragraph to a different.
Gemini: It summarised the article in a single paragraph. While it did point out the key speaking factors, the presentation was too congested and never very readable. It additionally missed out on/glazed over some essential elements.
Claude: Anthropic’s chatbot was probably the most organised in its presentation, however too prolonged to be thought-about a abstract. It additionally created a number of subheadings, which have been utterly pointless.
Winner: ChatGPT.
Whether you are making a presentation for work or making a venture for faculty, an image is unquestionably price a thousand phrases. So, it is a crucial ability that separates a median chatbot from essential. So, how did these chatbots carry out?
Prompt: A scenic pink home by a peaceful river, surrounded by tall inexperienced bushes. The home includes a sloped roof and huge home windows, set inside a well-maintained entrance yard. The yard includes a vibrant flower nursery with blooming flowers in neat rows. A bicycle is mendacity casually on the driveway in entrance of the home. The setting is peaceable, with clear blue skies and tender daylight filtering by means of the bushes. The scene ought to evoke a peaceful, countryside allure.
Claude: Regrettably, Claude doesn’t have picture era capabilities, which is a disgrace, given it is 2025, and even the typical open-source chatbots, equivalent to Qwen, can generate photographs.
Gemini vs ChatGPT picture era
ChatGPT: Our immediate deliberately included a lot of parts. Oftentimes, chatbots are good at following one or two parts in a picture, however no more than that. That is why we have been shocked to see that ChatGPT was not solely in a position to ship on each single instruction but additionally captured the essence of the image completely.
Gemini: Google’s chatbot was additionally in a position to adhere to a lot of the directions, however not all. However, in its defence, it did generate a extra practical bicycle. However, that was not sufficient to safe the win.
Winner: ChatGPT. Let us know when you really feel otherwise.
Due to restricted testing time, it was not doable to check the chatbots on another parameters, equivalent to coding, internet search, conversations, and productiveness. However, primarily based on what we might check and observe, ChatGPT wins the battle of chatbots and is the go-to for summarisation and picture era duties. However, on the subject of e mail, Claude does excel.