ILO AI Job Study: Why women are 3 times more likely than men to lose jobs to AI, as per ILO study |

As synthetic intelligence (AI) reshapes industries and automates duties at lightning pace, a brand new international study has uncovered a troubling fact: Women are three times more likely than men to lose their jobs to AI.The study, performed by the International Labour Organization (ILO), a United Nations company, reveals that this fast-moving wave of automation isn’t hitting everybody equally— and women are bearing the brunt of it.The numbers inform a stark storyIn wealthier international locations, round 10% of jobs held by women are at excessive threat of being changed by AI. In distinction, solely 3.5% of male-held jobs fall into that class. This isn’t nearly automation—it’s about widening the gender hole within the office.So, what’s behind this imbalance?The jobs most in dangerAccording to the ILO, AI is particularly likely to exchange clerical and administrative roles—jobs like typists, information entry clerks, bookkeepers, and even some monetary analysts and software program builders. These positions are usually repetitive, rule-based, and extremely digitized, making them superb targets for instruments like generative AI.And guess what? These roles are largely held by women.“Clerical jobs face the highest exposure of all,” says the ILO report. Senior economist Janine Berg provides, (*3*)It’s not simply low-level jobs anymoreWhat’s even more regarding is that AI is beginning to creep into higher-skilled fields too. Jobs in software program, finance, and media—as soon as thought-about protected from automation—are now in danger due to how digital and data-driven they’ve change into.That means even women in high-paying, cognitively demanding roles aren’t protected from the affect of AI.

The gender hole is rising

Jobs that are comparatively protected from AI—like cleaners, dentists, performers, and sanitation staff—are much less likely to be held by women. This creates a harmful imbalance that might widen present gaps in pay, employment, and profession development.Marek Troszyński, co-author of the ILO study, highlights the significance of this analysis: “This tool helps identify where GenAI will have the biggest impact, so countries can prepare and protect workers.”

A name for smarter insurance policies

The ILO is urging governments, employers, and labor organizations to take motion—now. The purpose? To be certain AI helps enhance job high quality and productiveness with out leaving women behind.

Tech isn’t impartial— And neither ought to our response be

At the guts of this study is a strong message: AI doesn’t work in a vacuum. It displays and amplifies present social buildings—together with biases.If we don’t act now, AI may deepen inequality within the workforce. But with good, inclusive insurance policies and proactive planning, we will form a future the place expertise helps fairness—not exclusion.The backside lineThe AI revolution is right here, and it’s altering how we work. The actual query is: Will we let it deepen the gender divide, or will we use it to construct a more inclusive world of labor?The reply will depend on what we do subsequent.