In the most recent reminder of how susceptible public gatherings stay to vehicle-ramming incidents, a minivan tore by a jubilant crowd in Liverpool on May 26, injuring greater than 45 folks—together with kids—through the metropolis’s Premier League victory parade. The attacker, a 53-year-old white British man, was arrested, however authorities have stated there isn’t a indication of terrorism, at the least for now. Yet the incident provides to a rising record of ramming assaults which have plagued cities throughout the globe—from Vancouver to Munich, Magdeburg to New Orleans and Zhuhai. In simply the previous six months, such assaults have killed 71 folks, in accordance to the National Transportation Security Center. So why are these assaults turning into extra frequent? And why are they so troublesome to cease?
Unlike bombings or coordinated shootings, car-ramming assaults require no subtle weapons, no superior coaching, and infrequently no formal planning. As Rand Corporation notes, “this tactic requires little or no training… and carries a relatively low risk of early detection.” A automobile is an on a regular basis object. It doesn’t elevate suspicion till it is already in movement—and by then, it’s too late.
While some ramming incidents are labeled as terrorism—such because the 2016 Nice Bastille Day assault or the 2025 New Year’s Day bloodbath in New Orleans—others are pushed by psychological well being points or fringe ideologies. There’s additionally a rising pattern of “lone actor” violence with numerous motivations. Right-wing extremism and misogynist ideologies have been linked to assaults just like the Charlottesville protest ramming in 2017 and the Toronto “incel” van assault in 2018. This variety in perpetrators complicates any effort to outline a single “profile” of the attacker.
A 2018 educational examine described vehicle-ramming as an “imitative” act. Once it enters public consciousness—by information, social media, and popular culture—it may be subconsciously added to a person’s menu of choices for expressing rage or dissent. “It becomes part of the repertoire,” sociologist Vincent Miller famous. “The profile of the perpetrator is very hard to define. The main thing they have in common is the act.”
Some attackers use rented or borrowed automobiles, exploiting lax safety checks or poor information sharing between rental companies and authorities. The 2021 Rand report famous a scarcity of industry-wide procedures, such as background checks or geofencing, that would limit automobile motion into pedestrian zones. Similarly, city planning in lots of cities hasn’t caught up with new threats. Wide, open boulevards with out bollards or boundaries provide a transparent path for destruction.
For the general public:
Car-ramming assaults exploit the peculiar to create extraordinary chaos. They bypass conventional counter-terror frameworks and flourish in a media-saturated world that inadvertently amplifies them. From a safety standpoint, they symbolize one of many hardest threats to anticipate—and some of the harrowing to endure. As Liverpool’s trauma joins a rising international record, the urgency to rethink city safety has by no means been clearer.